“Resolve”(Part 1)
Yakone did an excellent job arguing XCOM's side considering her position and the defenses given by her opponent. At the risk of opening up an ethical debate, I would have made three more points had I been in Yakone's shoes;
1) It is argued that a false electoral system is as good as the real thing since it creates peace of mind, but this ignores the fact that the need for deception shows a belief, even a knowledge, by the those enacting it that what they are doing would be seen as wrong, and this largely invalidates the argument.
2) At what point is there a line crossed when caring for humans only fits the desires of their overlords' plans? To use a very obvious parallel, would this man argue the aliens in the short story "To Serve Man" were benefactors because they stopped all world war, ended world hunger, and increased medical knowledge and lifespans, even though they were only doing this because they are humans, and wanted their cattle to be as safe and healthy as possible.
3) His statement that Yakone's argument would crumble should the Elders find their cute is completely unfounded as it assumes that the Elders would continue their benevolent actions after the cure is found. He has zero evidence that, one, the Elders wouldn't experiment on humans for other reasons, and two, that once they got what they wanted, the aliens would simply leave humanity and take their technology with them, leaving humanity to their own devices like a man who no longer wants to care for his dog and abandons it in the woods.